Rob, this shows that rather than hardware limiting us, it could actually drive us forward using *chaotic resonance*, it functions efficiently in the brain however, it is kind of difficult to simulate with LLMs in traditional digital way.
While LLMs operate differently from Electrodynamic Intelligence the concept of chaotic resonance reframes how intelligence, memory, and dynamics can be integrated in future AI. Since protein-based structures e.g. microtubules and ion channels use *chaotic resonance* to regulate signal amplification, memory access, and state transitions, they are functionally parallel to memristive computing described in a new manuscript <https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17162477> Matt, you don’t need the full biological structure- amino acids in the genetic code..., just like airplanes don’t need feathers to fly, we can capture the essential function without replicating the entire form Rather than depending on static, pre-trained models, such systems could adapt dynamically to their environment, using resonance to selectively access and process information with minimal energy overhead. ---Dorian Aur On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 7:46 PM Rob Freeman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 2:06 AM Dorian Aur <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ...Clearly, the EDI prototype cannot be built in a garage like earlier >> tech breakthroughs, its development demands sophisticated fabrication >> tools, multidisciplinary expertise, and access to advanced materials and >> infrastructure.This marks a shift from the era of individual inventors to >> one where coordinated institutional and national support becomes essential. >> With targeted investment from both public and private sectors, a functional >> *EDI >> prototype* could realistically be developed within 2–3 years, maybe less >> given the current pace of innovation >> > > Ah, well, you may have lost me there Dorian. So this is based on Colin > Hales ideas that cognition can only be built by directly using > electromagnetic fields. That's just the "embodiment" aspect of Colin's > ideas I objected to earlier. > > I don't think an effective dynamical insight into cognition need be > limited to any particular substrate. Worrying too much about the hardware > could hold us back. > > PS While Colin and Australia may not currently rank among the top >> countries positioned to build an EDI prototype, a "Sputnik moment" can >> occur from anywhere. The risk lies in focusing narrowly on LLMs and missing >> the broader paradigm shift >> > > On that point let me mention that Australia doesn't do too badly on the > neuromorphic computing front (though of course they lag New Zealand in > orbital and lunar rocketry :-) Moderately prominent neuromorphic startup > BrainChip hails from Australia. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Ta9b77fda597cc07a-M91d47197863c50de568eb9c2> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Ta9b77fda597cc07a-M6dbd2cb4cbf0a15ba78eb7a4 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
