Do you have a website with your research?

-- Matt Mahoney, [email protected]

On Sat, Mar 21, 2026, 2:50 AM Quan Tesla <[email protected]> wrote:

> Matt
>
> Going back to you not being able to locate my research, and concluding I
> was a fake researcher. Based on my investigation, your perspective was
> valid, but unreliable and publically damaging.
>
> I since discovered that researchgate "cancelled" my public profile without
> ever raising a query with me.
>
> However, when I logged in, all my research would always display. Even AI
> could not locate my research, or existing citations. Some of those papers
> were peer reviewed.
>
> I pointed out to the publishers that a cascade delete would cause
> tremendous damage to associated, published papers.
>
> I confronted their sys admin and while they feigned confusion, my public
> profile suddenly reappeared and significant activity ensued.
>
> It's been less than a month, and I noticed how again activity on my
> profile plummeted, even though new research was published. Not even a
> single view. Nah! This is the same pattern as before.
>
> So, the human-driven algorithms seem to be sanctioning novel and impacting
> research. I take this as a win.
>
> This seems to ve part of an emerging "research harvesting" AI-driven
> culture. Confirmed to me as a growing trend by AI.
>
> It could also be untouchable humans in organizations  controlling the
> scientific narrative while misappropriating research for own gain. All my
> tech's my own and the latest are under public, commercial license
> protection. Not that it protected my work before, but one has to persevere.
>
> Independent researchers are sitting ducks. Less than 1.5% of 0.00001% of
> the global pool of novel researchers ever attain publication. That
> translates into 2 persons for the potential 2400 - 8200 researchers of
> novel science out there.
>
>  I've submitted my latest novel research to a mathematics journal. After
> about a month, I'm still struggling to get them to acknowledge receipt of
> my research, let alone a review decision.
>
> Soon though, I'll secure more-appropriate interest abroad and withdraw my
> submission. Meantime, the preprint serves as prior art.
>
> Seems, the real issue with researchgate was with the cov epidemiological
> systems research, which I published a while ago with full sources listed
> and using an IEEE-published method set.
>
> While no one challenged, AI discovered a vague metatag suggestion that
> "either my research was removed or I was spreading false info". AI
> challenged my resesrcher claims as well, since rectified.
>
> The constructivist research must've hit a raw nerve somewhere.
>
> All my research is falsifiable, but no party ever bothered.
>
> I'm validating your concerns. I apologize without reserve for having been
> at loggerheads with you and for insulting you in any way.
>
> I'm now systematically relocating my research to a reliable publisher. My
> research, my problem.
>
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2026, 15:48 Matt Mahoney, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The article says that software developers using GitHub Copilot spend more
>> time on code development and less time on project management. About 96% of
>> developers don't trust AI generated code, so they spend more time reviewing
>> and fixing it, which takes more effort than talking to the human who wrote
>> it.
>>
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/s/bpjIpTbtrk
>>
>> In order words, AI has the same effect on developers as everyone else. We
>> spend more time talking to machines and less time talking to people.
>>
>>
>> -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected]
>>
> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> +
> delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription>
> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6540dc690a896d83-M29d66d7386fae5d523588ee6>
>

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6540dc690a896d83-M5e0f0ed2b5e4c4f9e2e77acd
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to