Todor, you seem confused as to how a machine trained to predict text can be
indistinguishable from conscious. I mean, this is what everyone on this
list was trying to build. And now it is here, and you can't believe it. Do
I understand you correctly?

-- Matt Mahoney, [email protected]

On Wed, Apr 8, 2026, 12:32 PM twenkid <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> https://artificial-mind.blogspot.com/2026/04/common-confusion-about-agency-will-soul.htm
>
> A discussion about the paper on Academia.edu:
> ** The Asymptotic Illusion: On the Ontological Limitations of Artificial
> Agency, *Mohamad Al-Zawahreh, 25.12.2025
> https://www.academia.edu/s/06c854dde5
>
> <https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/5038575496362915977/6360608488321697022#>
> *Todor Arnaudov*
> <https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/5038575496362915977/6360608488321697022#>
> 10 days ago
> <https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/5038575496362915977/6360608488321697022#>
> Hi, this is a common confusion - building a straw-man of Turing machines
> or "computation" as defined in this abstract sense, while the counterpart
> argument refers to the full "stack" definition of the systems, down to the
> lowest level virtual universes (See Theory of Universe and Mind, T.A.
> 2001-2004+, e.g. "Stack Theory is yet another fork of Theory of Universe
> and Mind", 2025). Neither computers, nor LLMs, AI (in whatever form) or
> whatever are "just" algorithms, "computation" etc. - they are immersed in
> the Universe and their implementation includes those "non-computable" parts
> as well. On the other hand, all these advanced thinking, theories, logic,
> reasoning about "quantum" etc. would have been impossible without all the
> science and technology, all "mechanical" processing etc., i.e. the mighty
> "conscious" being wouldn't have been capable to even formulate these
> problems and their [personal] "superiority", they would have been just
> silly apes. There are a lot of discussions about that in TOUM, including
> the latest additions in the hyperbook *"The Prophets of the Thinking
> Machines: AGI & Transhumanism: History, theory and pioneers; past, present
> and future"*. One point which I addressed in a letter to the cognitive
> semioticists Jordan Zlatev: the LLMs have no consciousness, but "just" etc.
> [see in appendix "Reflections on Everything" (Listove) from "The
> Prophets"]. However I haven't read anything but my own thoughts regarding
> the following problem, which is valid for humans and their mind as well: *WHAT
> and WHERE *exactly* the LLM is located, why and who (evaluator-observer)
> sets the boundary exactly there (at what resolution of causality-control
> and perception) and what *exactly* it is when fully defined in order to
> function. It is not "just" the weights of the NN (what the h* is "NN" in
> the physical universe - it includes the whole hardware, all chips, all
> connected computers - your PC or smartphone, the routers, the Internet
> servers, the main GPU servers; it included the original data, the data in
> the memory (other representation); it includes also the *HUMANS* who
> interact, their biology, their states; it is a result of a chain of
> operations and activities of all related humans and other technologies and
> ultimately it requires the whole universe to be what it is. * However,
> this is refuted and "vulgarized" to "they are algorithmic, they are "just
> 1s and 0s", "switches" (the earlier nonsense about computers, still
> defended e.g. by F.Faggin).
> (...)
> See the link for the complete comment and references to additional
> material.
> ...
>
> *The Sacred Computer: Thinking Machines, Creativity and Human Development
> - *since 2000
> https://github.com/twenkid/sigi-2025
> https://github.com/twenkid/sigi-202 <https://github.com/twenkid/sigi-2025>
> 6
>
>
>
> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> +
> delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription>
> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6856665e9e29064f-Mf9a5bfbf95400d5d960fbbf6>
>

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6856665e9e29064f-M9c08e0e630d50e94ee14b4cc
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to