With AI augmentation, it should - for humans - theoretically be limited to the natural spectrum.
On Wed, 02 Sept 2026, 12:27 John Rose via AGI, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Saturday, August 29, 2026, at 8:54 AM, Quan Tesla wrote: > > For example, I recently proposed a concept design for a non-GPS, cubist > proprietary dead reckoning AI-enabled nodal network. Its intended purpose > was to securely and safely identify, track and potentially communicate with > and track UAPs (all craft?), including for securing 'human-in-the-loop' > observers and all equipment and data. A pretty cool wearable harness to > have. Unfortunately, the organization the conceptual rationale and layout > was submitted to declined the proposal. > > > I was recently looking into something related to this having to do with > the historical learning across AI model generations and mobile phone > electromagnetics. Humans can naturally detect magnetic forces for example > some dowsers find buried gold by “feeling” magnetic field lines. What is > the best confirmed human fidelity on radio waves... without a harness or > nano. Difficult to find this information. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T08974f0b616697ac-Md96716e50953d4641bf8ca9e> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T08974f0b616697ac-Mc9d75f57b8cf2e01a5253d66 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
