Look at the elements referred to by the concepts I listed – they are *not* 
“common elements”.   They can all be “diverse*/uncommon elements.
Here, for example,  are “7” poplars:
http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/monet/poplars-epte/monet.poplars-epte.jpg 
They do not classify as common elements. Each poplar is a different and 
individual form.  They do not form a pattern.
Concepts create the “illusion” of referring to common elements/objects (and 
therefore patterns) because of their apparent, *intrinsic* form - the way they 
are spelled or numbered.
C-H-A-I-R is always spelled the same way therefore surely there must be an 
essential chair or chair pattern as Plato thought.
“9” is always spelled/numbered the same way, therefore surely there must be an 
essential number or pattern.
(In fact, even that is an untrue illusion because all concepts can be spelled 
and/or numbered with many diverse fonts!).
To counter this, instead of an abstract “9”, try thinking in terms of  a 
graphic representation of the concept,  such as    “ l l l l l l l l l”  - (all 
concepts can and should be depicted graphically).
Now it’s easier to see that while a concept may appear patterned intrinsically, 
 its REFERENTS are not.   “Nine” or “seven” real poplar trees will come in 
diverse, unpatterned forms, like those of Monet, not in identically patterned 
lines like those of maths. Ditto nine or seven rocks, snakes, apples etc.
The real world referents of concepts and numbers don’t come in neatly patterned 
forms let alone patterned groups.  
And each concept can refer to “all kinds of things” -   all kinds of 
poplars/trees, all kinds of chairs, rocks, streams, clouds etc. – which can 
come in “all shapes, sizes and forms” not in uniform patterns.. 
Ben and Boris and you probably, don’t realise that concepts don’t refer to a 
patterned real world, because you all live and breathe this artificial 
logicomathematical world of perfectly patterned numbers and letters cut off 
from the real world -   at a metacognitive level, you never really apply your 
concepts to the real world 
From: Aaron Hosford 
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 8:02 PM
To: AGI 
Subject: Re: [agi] Pattern: definition & incremental syntax.. P.S.

"9" *is* the pattern. The rest of the details are parameters to that pattern. I 
don't know if you program or not, but if you do, "9" would be a class, and all 
the examples would be instances. You state the name of a pattern, and then look 
at the context surrounding it and ask where it is. You're subtracting out what 
you're looking for before you look for it, so it's no wonder you can't see it.


On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]> wrote:

  Those are really conceptual complexes.

  But it doesn't matter.

  Let's start with the obvious, "simple" concept of  "9"  .

  Which can refer to nine *abstract entities*, *trees*, *snakes*,  *boxes*  -

  or a "broken nine",  or a "an inflated nine"  or *nine diverse objects* or *a 
mixed-up nine*

  or * ......... *  or  " ^ /. h k < X ,@ "

  or

  Where's the pattern?

  [The same reasoning/examples applies to all the equations taken as wholes].

  All the equations you cite, like the whole of maths and logic, are patterned, 
specific *applications*/examples of given concepts.

  But maths does not and cannot use concepts wholly/ properly with their 
open-ended realms of reference.

  Concepts like "Line" and "number" in ordinary language can embrace infinite 
examples, which are non-mathematical and which mathematics wouldn't go near.



  -----Original Message----- From: Matt Mahoney
  Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 7:29 PM
  To: AGI
  Subject: Re: [agi] Pattern: definition & incremental syntax.. P.S. 


  On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]> 
wrote:

    show one single concept in the whole of *MATHEMATICS* or *LOGIC* that is
    patterned.


  9 x 9 + 7 = 88
  98 x 9 + 6 = 888
  987 x 9 + 5 = 8888
  9876 x 9 + 4 = 88888
  98765 x 9 + 3 = 888888
  987654 x 9 + 2 = 8888888
  9876543 x 9 + 1 = 88888888


  -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected]


  -------------------------------------------
  AGI
  Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now

  RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/6952829-59a2eca5
  Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; 

  Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com 


  -------------------------------------------
  AGI
  Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
  RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23050605-bcb45fb4
  Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
  Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com



      AGI | Archives  | Modify Your Subscription   



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to