Look at the elements referred to by the concepts I listed – they are *not* “common elements”. They can all be “diverse*/uncommon elements. Here, for example, are “7” poplars: http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/monet/poplars-epte/monet.poplars-epte.jpg They do not classify as common elements. Each poplar is a different and individual form. They do not form a pattern. Concepts create the “illusion” of referring to common elements/objects (and therefore patterns) because of their apparent, *intrinsic* form - the way they are spelled or numbered. C-H-A-I-R is always spelled the same way therefore surely there must be an essential chair or chair pattern as Plato thought. “9” is always spelled/numbered the same way, therefore surely there must be an essential number or pattern. (In fact, even that is an untrue illusion because all concepts can be spelled and/or numbered with many diverse fonts!). To counter this, instead of an abstract “9”, try thinking in terms of a graphic representation of the concept, such as “ l l l l l l l l l” - (all concepts can and should be depicted graphically). Now it’s easier to see that while a concept may appear patterned intrinsically, its REFERENTS are not. “Nine” or “seven” real poplar trees will come in diverse, unpatterned forms, like those of Monet, not in identically patterned lines like those of maths. Ditto nine or seven rocks, snakes, apples etc. The real world referents of concepts and numbers don’t come in neatly patterned forms let alone patterned groups. And each concept can refer to “all kinds of things” - all kinds of poplars/trees, all kinds of chairs, rocks, streams, clouds etc. – which can come in “all shapes, sizes and forms” not in uniform patterns.. Ben and Boris and you probably, don’t realise that concepts don’t refer to a patterned real world, because you all live and breathe this artificial logicomathematical world of perfectly patterned numbers and letters cut off from the real world - at a metacognitive level, you never really apply your concepts to the real world From: Aaron Hosford Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 8:02 PM To: AGI Subject: Re: [agi] Pattern: definition & incremental syntax.. P.S.
"9" *is* the pattern. The rest of the details are parameters to that pattern. I don't know if you program or not, but if you do, "9" would be a class, and all the examples would be instances. You state the name of a pattern, and then look at the context surrounding it and ask where it is. You're subtracting out what you're looking for before you look for it, so it's no wonder you can't see it. On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]> wrote: Those are really conceptual complexes. But it doesn't matter. Let's start with the obvious, "simple" concept of "9" . Which can refer to nine *abstract entities*, *trees*, *snakes*, *boxes* - or a "broken nine", or a "an inflated nine" or *nine diverse objects* or *a mixed-up nine* or * ......... * or " ^ /. h k < X ,@ " or Where's the pattern? [The same reasoning/examples applies to all the equations taken as wholes]. All the equations you cite, like the whole of maths and logic, are patterned, specific *applications*/examples of given concepts. But maths does not and cannot use concepts wholly/ properly with their open-ended realms of reference. Concepts like "Line" and "number" in ordinary language can embrace infinite examples, which are non-mathematical and which mathematics wouldn't go near. -----Original Message----- From: Matt Mahoney Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 7:29 PM To: AGI Subject: Re: [agi] Pattern: definition & incremental syntax.. P.S. On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]> wrote: show one single concept in the whole of *MATHEMATICS* or *LOGIC* that is patterned. 9 x 9 + 7 = 88 98 x 9 + 6 = 888 987 x 9 + 5 = 8888 9876 x 9 + 4 = 88888 98765 x 9 + 3 = 888888 987654 x 9 + 2 = 8888888 9876543 x 9 + 1 = 88888888 -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/6952829-59a2eca5 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?& Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23050605-bcb45fb4 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?& Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
