Has anyone here seen an interesting paper in the conference? From the few that I quickly looked at I found that those that I can understand really seem like the daydream stuff that I gave up a few years ago and those that I don't understand do not seem like they are based in anything feasible.
For example, Demski's paper is one that I don't understand, but based on my previous discussions with Demski, I have no reason to believe that it is feasibly relevant to much of anything. So I really don't understand it, but I also have not found a reason to believe that I should spend any more time trying to understand what he is talking about. Can anyone explain to me what Demski was talking about and why anyone would believe it might be useful without lapsing into a degenerate explanation that relies on a non-feasible argument as a prior? For example, my conversations about Boolean Satisfiability have been of interest to me, but the idea that a non-existant polynomial time solution is feasibly relevant or anything more then imaginatively speculative is absurd. Jim Bromer ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
