You don't have enough math here.
People are now looking more at the mathematical formalisms of software systems. There are so many and of such variety. Hawkins has one approach not the only approach. He's hardcoding the components mimicked from biological intelligence. Are there more efficient and easier to build components and are there components that morph? His don't morph. It looks to me like hardcoded AI BUT I haven't studied the system. John From: Azn A [mailto:[email protected]] http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/03/29/hawkins_ai_feature "These are complex biological systems that were not designed by mathematical principles [that are] very difficult to formalize completely," he told us. "This reminds me a bit of the beginning of the computer era," he said. "If you go back to the 1930s and early 1940s, when people first started thinking about computers they were really interested in whether an algorithm would complete, and they were looking for mathematical completeness, a mathematical proof. If you today build a computer, no one sits around saying 'let's look at the mathematical formalism of this computer.' It reminds me a little about that. We still have people saying 'You don't have enough math here!' AGI | <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/248029-3b178a58> | <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Modify Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
