As much as i hate to admit it, a book by Goertzel is about 100 times more illuminating than the inventor's "Higher Intelligence". Now, even though I don't believe in Penrosian "magic" (the idea that only some hardware configurations give rise to a mind because of known or even unknown physics), working without proper 3-dimensional chips is killing me. In van der Made's patent we mostly have one more "neural chip" and some promise for stacking them perhaps. And this will solve all problems because? http://www.google.com/patents/US8250011 . Nah, neural chips will become a commercial success when cheap enough, but solving AGI, I don't think so.
AT On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Colin Geoffrey Hales via AGI < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder what the group thinks about this venture and the people involved? > > http://www.aziana.com.au/ > > What's your take on 'Brainchip' itself as an approach? > > Is this real or just leap for cash? > > Cheers > Colin > > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/14050631-7d925eb1 > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
