On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:38 PM, John Rose <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Matt Mahoney [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 7:04 AM, John Rose <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I don't believe AGI will be solved with quantum computers, because the brain >> is not >> a quantum computer. > > Are you sure? Does belief in something effect on whether or not it is true? > > Uhm, actually it does. > >> I don't believe in psi, and I think it is even less likely that P = NP. You >> might disagree. > > C'mon. Psi is really 'spooky action at a distance' no? Would precognition be > non-local quantum entanglement faster than speed of light? > > I don't believe P = NP but I don't discount the remote possibility of it, yet. > > John
I am now totally confident that P=NP. However, only being able to find one logical solution in polynomial time seems pretty tedious to me. The real challenge is to find a way to characterize all the solutions in polynomial time. If possible that would be amazing. Jim Bromer ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
