John, Yea. Maybe look at what wiggles when exposed to ultrasound and what doesn't move - to show how anchored various structures are. I suspect the Q of anything (like brain cells) immersed in liquid with random attachments would be quite low, like <1, so there wouldn't be much information from frequency-dependence. Any patters would be macroscopic - with wavelengths probably larger than the entire viewable area of a high-resolution virtual slice, so I don't (yet) see the value in patterns.
Is this along the line of your thoughts? *Steve* =============== On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve, > > > > Congrats on the patent, and this is a good read. At first I was skeptical > but it’s very interesting. > > > > Here’s a thought: > > Take this design, the techniques you have and replace/add a short > wavelength vibrational scanner with cymatic pattern analysis. Basically > induce/scan across vibrational frequencies while computationally detecting > molecular cymatic pattern emission and position. And potentially integrate > the two techniques so there would be cymatic + fluorescence analysis. > > > > Naturally some vibrational frequencies will be destructive so those you > can hit those during latter scans. Just as some particle bombardment is > degrading. Depends on the payoff I guess, what sweet spot frequencies > produce best emission data for a scanning strategy. > > > > Thinking further... what really would be inventive would be a "scope" that > sees backward in time. 2 options. One that really can see back in time, > which would require some new engineering physics, and one that looks back > in time computationally, being in some ways similar to prediction into the > future. > > > > Generally the more intelligence involved the faster and more accurate > looking backwards in time is. Human agents only see so accurately into the > past and future. We do see farther collectively. A defining aspect and a > way perhaps to measure our intelligent minds as engines is the efficiency > we have to see into the past, to look at a forest for example and > reconstruct it backwards in time comparing it to the actual. A super > omni-intelligence, whatever that is, would be able to see perfectly all the > way into the past "losslessly". We just have in our imaginational "scope" a > short term jpeg-like compression view into the past. What makes us human > though and not gods is the limited computational ability of our minds or > the… inability to tesseract the Hamming distance or,.. engage a > reverse-entropy lens J > > > > John > > > > *From:* Steve Richfield [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Saturday, December 19, 2015 3:06 AM > *To:* AGI <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [agi] Another Patent Celebration... > > > > Hi all, > > I just got word that the patent for my super duper microscope for > diagramming brains now has a number - 9,229,213. > > This won't be official until January 5th, but you heard it first here. > > For those who want a sneak peek, I put up a small web site for it at: > > http://CoincidentFocus.weebly.com > > AGIers should look at the patent application and NOT the hype on the web > site. To do this, click on the [Link to Patent] box at the bottom of the > page. > > Maybe with some real INFORMATION, everyone here can stop wild guessing how > we work and get down to the serious business of implementing true > intelligence. > > > > Now, I need a CEO to turn this into gigabucks and true AGI. Any takers? > > *Steve* > > > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/248029-82d9122f>| Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription > > <http://www.listbox.com> > > > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10443978-6f4c28ac> | > Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> > Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> > -- Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a six hour workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back full employment. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
