agi  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Jim Bromer via AGI
  • RE: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Jim Bromer via AGI
  • RE: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Samantha Atkins
  • Re: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Jim Bromer
  • RE: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models John Rose via AGI
  • RE: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • Re: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • Re: [agi] SAT and Dynamic Programs of Models Jim Bromer via AGI
• [agi] Couple thoughts Mike Archbold via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Telmo Menezes via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Telmo Menezes via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts martin biehl via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts martin biehl via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Mike Archbold via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Mike Archbold via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Mike Archbold via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Mike Archbold via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Russ Hurlbut via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Mike Archbold via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts TJ Katal via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Mike Archbold via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts John Rose via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Logan Streondj via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Couple thoughts Logan Streondj via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Couple thoughts Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
• [agi] TGD Consciousness = The Universe Exists Because We Perceive It John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [agi] TGD Consciousness = The Universe Exists Because We Perceive It martin biehl via AGI
  • RE: [agi] TGD Consciousness = The Universe Exists Because We Perceive It John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [agi] TGD Consciousness = The Universe Exists Because We Perceive It martin biehl via AGI
  • Re: [agi] TGD Consciousness = The Universe Exists Because We Perceive It Jim Bromer via AGI
  • RE: [agi] TGD Consciousness = The Universe Exists Because We Perceive It John Rose via AGI
• [agi] Using opencyc as an Ontology Duncan Murray via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Using opencyc as an Ontology Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Using opencyc as an Ontology Duncan Murray via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Using opencyc as an Ontology Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Using opencyc as an Ontology Logan Streondj via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Using opencyc as an Ontology Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Using opencyc as an Ontology Logan Streondj via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Using opencyc as an Ontology Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • [AGI] Using OpenCyc as an Ontology Duncan Murray via AGI
  • Re: [AGI] Using OpenCyc as an Ontology Ben Goertzel via AGI
  • Re: [AGI] Using OpenCyc as an Ontology Duncan Murray via AGI
  • RE: [AGI] Using OpenCyc as an Ontology John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [AGI] Using OpenCyc as an Ontology Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • RE: [AGI] Using OpenCyc as an Ontology John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [AGI] Using OpenCyc as an Ontology Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • RE: [AGI] Using OpenCyc as an Ontology John Rose via AGI
• [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Logan Streondj via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • RE: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Mike Archbold via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Jim Bromer via AGI
  • RE: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Mike Archbold via AGI
  • RE: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Mike Archbold via AGI
  • RE: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Logan Streondj via AGI
  • RE: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT John Rose via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] A Polynomial Time Solution to 3-SAT Jim Bromer via AGI
• [agi] 3-SAT Has Something Similar to Multiplication Jim Bromer via AGI
• [agi] FYI: Whole Brain Architecture ARAKAWA Naoya via AGI
  • RE: [agi] FYI: Whole Brain Architecture Piaget Modeler via AGI
• [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Jim Bromer via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Jim Bromer via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Jim Bromer via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Jim Bromer via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Jim Bromer via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks Piaget Modeler via AGI
• [agi] Analog Computing. Alan Grimes via AGI
• [agi] continuous Turing machines YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤) via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines Ted Sanders via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines Mike Archbold via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines ARAKAWA Naoya via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines Mike Archbold via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines Ben Goertzel via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤) via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines Steve Richfield via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • Re: [agi] continuous Turing machines Steve Richfield via AGI
  • RE: [agi] continuous Turing machines John Rose via AGI
• [agi] Ninja Katze agi
• [agi] IS Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] IS Matt Mahoney via AGI
  • RE: [agi] IS Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] IS agi
  • Re: [agi] IS Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • RE: [agi] IS Piaget Modeler via AGI
• [agi] Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Jim Bromer via AGI
  • [agi] Re: Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Re: Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Re: Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Re: Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Samantha Atkins via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Re: Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Re: Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Jim Bromer via AGI
  • [agi] Re: Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Mike Archbold via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Jim Bromer via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Samantha Atkins via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Mike Archbold via AGI
  • Re: [agi] Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Jim Bromer via AGI
  • RE: [agi] Static and Dynamic Conceptual Structure? Piaget Modeler via AGI
• [agi] The Unknown Cause Piaget Modeler via AGI
  • Re: [agi] The Unknown Cause justcamel via AGI
  • Re: [agi] The Unknown Cause Aaron Hosford via AGI
  • Re: [agi] The Unknown Cause Steve Richfield via AGI
  • Re: [agi] The Unknown Cause Mike Archbold via AGI

• Earlier messages
• Later messages