agi  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [agi] My trip report -- 400ug LSD + marijuana + Nitrous oxide agi
• [agi] preschool for robots at Berkeley fpleyer76
• [agi] Design notes for a new FPGA computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new FPGA computing language Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new FPGA computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new FPGA computing language Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new FPGA computing language Steve Richfield
• [agi] Don't You Have to Be Able to Acknowledge Particular Mistakes to Learn From Them? Jim Bromer
• [agi] , andre . valdez
• [agi] Genifer 5.3 design notes Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
  • Re: [agi] Genifer 5.3 design notes Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Genifer 5.3 design notes Mike Archbold
• [agi] Interesting eBay ad... Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Interesting eBay ad... Duncan Murray
• [agi] AGI Builders Aaron Hosford
• [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Duncan Murray
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Eugene Surowtz
  • RE: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Tony Cole
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents EdFromNH .
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Mike Archbold
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Tony Cole
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Tony Cole
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Logan Streondj
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Logan Streondj
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Recent court decisions regarding software patents Mike Archbold
• [agi] Report on Experimental Results or Try to Make Arguments of Some Substance Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Report on Experimental Results or Try to Make Arguments of Some Substance Aaron Hosford
  • Re: [agi] Report on Experimental Results or Try to Make Arguments of Some Substance Jim Bromer
• [agi] WE GET SIGNAL Alan Grimes
  • Re: [agi] WE GET SIGNAL Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] WE GET SIGNAL Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] WE GET SIGNAL Aaron Hosford
• [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • RE: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Anastasios Tsiolakidis
  • RE: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • RE: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • RE: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Aaron Hosford
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Aaron Hosford
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Aaron Hosford
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • RE: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Directives Are an Important for AI Aaron Hosford
  • [agi] Re: Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Re: Directives Are an Important for AI Aaron Hosford
  • [agi] Re: Directives Are an Important for AI Jim Bromer
• [agi] 100:1 Speedup Steve Richfield
• [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • RE: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Duncan Murray
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Mike Archbold
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Juan Carlos Kuri Pinto
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Juan Carlos Kuri Pinto
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Juan Carlos Kuri Pinto
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Ben Goertzel
  • RE: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Nanograte Knowledge Technologies
  • RE: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Logan Streondj
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Logan Streondj
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Logan Streondj
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Logan Streondj
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language J Rao
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Logan Streondj
  • RE: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Design notes for a new parallel computing language Mike Archbold
• [agi] A System of Binary Flags is not an Unary System. Jim Bromer
• [agi] Cortana Alan Grimes
  • Xaoice Re: [agi] Cortana Logan Streondj
• [agi] Inviting someone to join Steve Richfield
  • RE: [agi] Inviting someone to join John Rose
• [agi] July 27-30 Re: Digest for AGI Angus Rowe MacPherson
• [agi] News from WORLDCOMP Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] News from WORLDCOMP Dr Miles Dyson
  • Re: [agi] News from WORLDCOMP Steve Richfield
• [agi] Beliefs about Consciousness! Andrés Gómez Emilsson
  • Re: [agi] Beliefs about Consciousness! Pawel Pachniewski
  • Re: [agi] Beliefs about Consciousness! EdFromNH .
  • Re: [agi] Beliefs about Consciousness! Logan Streondj
  • Re: [agi] Beliefs about Consciousness! Arnold Muller
• [agi] maybe OFF TOPIC: US Empire Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
  • [agi] Re: maybe OFF TOPIC: US Empire Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
  • [agi] Re: maybe OFF TOPIC: US Empire Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
  • [agi] Re: maybe OFF TOPIC: US Empire Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
  • Fwd: [agi] Re: maybe OFF TOPIC: US Empire Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
• [agi] Jürgen Schmidhuber has set up his own AI company fpleyer76
  • Re: [agi] Jürgen Schmidhuber has set up his own AI company Matt Lind
• [agi] Defining "frustration" Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Defining "frustration" Russ Hurlbut
  • RE: [agi] Defining "frustration" Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Defining "frustration" Russ Hurlbut
  • RE: [agi] Defining "frustration" Piaget Modeler
  • RE: [agi] Defining "frustration" Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Defining "frustration" Jim Bromer
  • RE: [agi] Defining "frustration" Piaget Modeler
  • RE: [agi] Defining "frustration" Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Defining "frustration" Jim Bromer
  • RE: [agi] Defining "frustration" Piaget Modeler
• [agi] AGI PR: personhood Logan Streondj
• [agi] I Made a Serious Mistake On Ny Plan for a 3-SAT Solver Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] I Made a Serious Mistake On Ny Plan for a 3-SAT Solver Mike Archbold
  • Re: [agi] I Made a Serious Mistake On Ny Plan for a 3-SAT Solver Jim Bromer
  • [agi] Re: I Made a Serious Mistake On Ny Plan for a 3-SAT Solver Jim Bromer
  • [agi] Re: I Made a Serious Mistake On Ny Plan for a 3-SAT Solver Jim Bromer
• [agi] ibm watson gets deep learning built in fpleyer76
  • Re: [agi] ibm watson gets deep learning built in J. Andrew Rogers
  • agi allegory Re: [agi] ibm watson gets deep learning built in Logan Streondj
  • RE: agi allegory Re: [agi] ibm watson gets deep learning built in Piaget Modeler
• [agi] General thoughts on complexity, complicatedness and AGI... Ben Goertzel
  • [agi] Re: [AGI-group] General thoughts on complexity, complicatedness and AGI... Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] General thoughts on complexity, complicatedness and AGI... Jim Bromer
• [agi] Stigmergy Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Aaron Hosford
  • RE: [agi] Stigmergy Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Aaron Hosford
  • RE: [agi] Stigmergy Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Jim Bromer
  • RE: [agi] Stigmergy Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Aaron Hosford
  • RE: [agi] Stigmergy Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Aaron Hosford
  • RE: [agi] Stigmergy Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Mike Archbold
  • RE: [agi] Stigmergy Piaget Modeler
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Aaron Hosford
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Aaron Hosford
  • Re: [agi] Stigmergy Jim Bromer
  • RE: [agi] Stigmergy Piaget Modeler
• [agi] Test Your Skill at Problem Solving Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Test Your Skill at Problem Solving Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Test Your Skill at Problem Solving Jim Bromer
• [agi] n-ary SAT Jim Bromer
  • [agi] Re: n-ary SAT Jim Bromer
• [agi] Positive AGI portrayal: Chappie! Logan Streondj
  • Re: [agi] Positive AGI portrayal: Chappie! Mark Seveland
• [agi] The Mercedes Effect Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] The Mercedes Effect Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] The Mercedes Effect Steve Richfield
• [agi] Open dare to the GOERTZEL Alan Grimes
• Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? (was: Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation) Dean Pomerleau
  • [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Logan Streondj
  • Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Samantha Atkins
  • RE: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Piaget Modeler

• Earlier messages
• Later messages