The Singularity Summit should include all points of
view, including advocates for regulation of intelligent
machines. It will weaken the Summit to exclude this
point of view.
Then it would be better if the Summit were not held at all. Nanotech, AGI etc advanced enough that constructive discussion of regulations would be possible, even if one agreed with them in principle, are still a very long way from even being on the horizon; talk of Singularity right now is wildly premature as anything other than inspiring science fiction; and blindly slapping on regulations at this point increases the probability that humanity will simply die without ever getting near the Singularity.
Will the Summit include that point of view?
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
