Richard, could you describe your algorithms in a general way (I'm not asking
for any proprietary information), so I could see if they would fit into my
concept of a KBMS?
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Scanlon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <agi@v2.listbox.com>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] The concept of a KBMS
Richard Loosemore wrote:
When you say that it "provides ... a general AI shell, within which any
AI algorithms can be experimented with ...", I find myself exasperated
[tho' not to worry, I am exasperated a lot ;-) ] -- it does not provide
a language shell within which *any* of the algorithms that I work with
can be experimented with. There is not even a shred of relationship
between the kind of 'simplified-natural-language' systems and interfaces
being discussed on this list right now, and the entire class of
intelligent systems that I would consider the most viable candidates for
cognition.
So, within the confines of certain conventional stuff talked about in
whatever they teach in CS Artificial Intelligence courses these days,
maybe these interfaces would help ... but it would be overstating the
case to say that this includes all AI designs.
I am certainly exasperated with most AI work also. Giving someone a
Ph.D in artificial intelligence is like giving someone a degree in
aeronautical engineering before the Wright brothers.
If you could provide a basic description of your algorithms I might be
able to show how they could be tested within my concept of a KBMS.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
