But it seems like what Loosemore wants is an environment that will help
him **discover** the right AGI design ... this is a different matter....
Or am I misunderstanding?
Somewhat. He made it sound that way but I would also assert that having
such an environment would also certainly help speed up Novamente development
where you clearly already have and are following a high-level design. Your
subprojects and your research into learning algorithms would certainly
benefit even more.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Goertzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <agi@v2.listbox.com>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda
Mark Waser wrote:
>> IMO, creating an AGI isn't really a programming problem. The hard
part is knowing exactly what to program. Which is why it turns into a
programming problem . . . . I started out as a biochemist studying
enzyme kinetics. The only reasonable way to get a reasonable turn-around
time on testing a new "fancy formula" was to update the simulation
program myself. If the tools were there (i.e. Loosemoore's environment),
it wouldn't be a programming problem. Since they aren't, the programming
turns into a/the real problem. :-)
Well, programming AGI takes more time and effort now than it would with
more appropriate programming tools ...
But it seems like what Loosemore wants is an environment that will help
him **discover** the right AGI design ... this is a different matter....
Or am I misunderstanding?
-- Ben
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
