Perhaps people are more interested in the design of this AGI project, and the likelyhood of it ever creating an human-level AGI. Also, are design changes chosen democratically, by a leader/lead designer (you?), or how? I'm also concerned, that too much time (man-hours if you will) is spend determining the 'contributions'/rating code, relative to the time spend actually creating the AGI.
----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=e9e40a7e
