On Thursday 18 September 2008, Mike Tintner wrote: > In principle, I'm all for the idea that I think you (and perhaps > Bryan) have expressed of a "GI Assistant" - some program that could > be of general assistance to humans dealing with similar > problems across many domains. A diagnostics expert, perhaps, that > could help analyse breakdowns in say, the human body, a car or any of > many other machines, a building or civil structure, etc. etc. And > it's certainly an idea worth exploring.
That's just one of the many projects I have going, however. It's easy enough to wire it up to a simple perceptron, or weights-adjustable additive function, or even physically up to a neural tissue culture for sorting through the hiss and the noise of 'bad results'. This isn't your fabled intelligence. > But I have yet to see any evidence that it is any more viable than a > proper AGI - because, I suspect, it will run up against the same It's not aiming to be AGI in the first place though. - Bryan ________________________________________ http://heybryan.org/ Engineers: http://heybryan.org/exp.html irc.freenode.net #hplusroadmap ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
