Hi, Sometimes outrageous comments are a catalyst for better ideas.
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 01:48 +0200, Jan Klauck wrote: > Mike Tintner trolled > > > And maths will handle the examples given : > > > > same tunes - different scales, different instruments > > same face - cartoon, photo > > same logo - different parts [buildings/ fruits/ human figures] > > Unfortunately I forgot. The answer is somewhere down there: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eigenvalue,_eigenvector_and_eigenspace > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern_recognition > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve_fitting > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_identification > No-one has successfully integrated these concepts into a working AGI, despite numerous attempts. Even though these concept feel general, when implemented, only narrow or "affected by combinatorial explosion" have succeeded. > > revealing them to be the same - how exactly? > > Why should anybody explain that mystery to you? You are not an > accepted member of the Grand Lodge of AGI Masons or its affiliates. > > > Or you could take two arseholes - same kind of object, but radically > > different configurations - maths will show them to belong to the same > > category, how? > > How will you do it? By licking them? Personal attacks only weaken your arguments. > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > agi > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
