On 29 Jun, 2009, at 23:38 , Allen Bierbaum wrote:
> The one potential problem I can see with the current licensing > proposed is that an organization with several very small teams > (feature teams for example) is going to end up with a fairly high cost > compared to other solutions. Sure, the idea is that a Scrum Team, is 1 Scrum Master, 1 Product Owner and up to 9 Team Members :-) That is 11 people working for about 10 € per month including professional support and just-in-time bugfixing and workaround... which is not much, at least seen from here. We are very open to discuss this, and hear from all of you what do you think it would be reasonable :-) > Have you given any thought to having a "grouped" user license or > something? Maybe along the lines of each "team" being 10 developers. > Thus a company with 7 developers and 5 teams would only pay for one > "team" license? Well that doesn't really sound Scrum :-) Anyway you could still have a big team, only one, with all the people inside, and use the same license on 5 different "Product" (Agilo Project) just assigning to the Sprint a Capacity only to the Team Members working on that Sprint :-) > It is obviously totally up to you guys, I am just thinking out loud > here about a potential problem in the licensing. Allen, you know we are really open and we build Agilo like it is thanks to all the feedbacks we get from you users... so we don't consider anything entirely up to us :-) Thank you > -Allen ANdreaT --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Agilo for Scrum" group. This group is moderated by agile42 GmbH http://www.agile42.com and is focused in supporting Agilo for Scrum users. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/agilo?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
