On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I initiate a criminal case against comex, alleging that e violated > Rule 101(vii) and Goethe's defined rights by initiating a criminal case > against Goethe, when Goethe is already being punished for the same single > action (by having to defend emself in a separate, previously-initiated > criminal case). > > Arguments: > > The act of being brought to trial and having to defend oneself is a > punishment. This is like saying that speaking out against someone is a punishment. The only penalization in a criminal CFJ recognized by the Game of Agora is a sentence, and by CFJ 1488, I am not guilty of engineering the potential situation in which each case nets you a different one. I end the pre-trial phase.
(In fact, I somehow managed to not see root's message despite it being located (in GMail) directly above my reply. Perhaps there should be a way to "support" a criminal case, and thereby increase the punishment if the defendant is GUILTY. Mob psychology and all.)
