Goethe wrote:
> And given the criminalization of the appeal, the fact that
> the original judge can be found innocent (not even excused) with no appeal
> following shows that the people defending the system are not up to
> the task. And there is no point in being a part of an "Agora" as long
> as the people and the system legitimize impropriety to the point of
> punishing attempts to correct it.
(1) Suggested criminalization, and (2) I suspect this problem needs to
be fixed legislatively. I was waiting to see if someone else would
take a crack at it, but
Proto-Proposal: Defend the judiciary
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 2158 (Judicial Questions) by inserting this paragraph after
the paragraph containing "A judgement is valid and/or appropriate only
as defined by the rules.":
In the interest of defending the judicial system as a paragon of
virtue, unfairly self-interested judgements are never appropriate,
rules to the contrary notwithstanding.
