> ============================ Appeal 1935a ============================ > > Appellant ais523's Arguments: > > Although my judgement is currently correct, it ought not to be. Using the > appeals process has the potential to delay a remanded or reassigned > judgement > until after OVERLOOKED has been fixed. (Note that when appealing my own > judgement in this way, I believe that I'm skirting around the intention of > Rule 911; but in my view, it's appropriate to use one scam to fix another.)
Agoran tradition is to reward valid scams, generally by allowing the scamster to benefit from eir scam before fixing the bug. In the interest of rewarding comex, therefore, I believe it would be most appropriate not to try to "fix" eir scam in this way. I therefore intend with the support of Murphy and root to cause the panel to judge AFFIRM with the preceding paragraph as a concurring opinion. Pavitra
