AGORAN PROPOSAL AWARDS Time of last report: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:02 Time of this report: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:28
PARTIES ------- BobTHJ Wooble Quazie ELIGIBLE PROPOSALS (Jun 9 - Jun 15) ---------------------------------- NUM FL AI SUBMITTER TITLE x5538 D1 3 comex <none> x5539 O1 1.7 comex An elephant sometimes forgets *5540 D0 3 ais523 <none> RECENT EVENTS ------------- Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:50 - BobTHJ and Wooble agree. Contract created Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:48 - Quazie joins Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:59 - Agreement amended by BobTHJ TEXT OF CONTRACT ---------------- 1. The name of this contract is "The Agoran Proposal Awards". The Host for this contract is BobTHJ. This is a Public Contract. 2. Any player may become party to this contract by announcement. Any person may cease to be party to this contract by announcement. This contract may be amended by any party without three objections 3. Once each week, each player may submit a single ballot by announcement containing their votes for the eligible proposal which in their opinion is the best fit for each of the following categories (the eligible proposals for any given week are the proposals whose voting period ended during the previous week): a. Dry - appropriate for proposals that display paticular aridity and/or blandness. Proposals nominated for this category should be good bedtime reading. b. Sticky - appropriate for proposals that commingle two distinct and separate game concepts together into one proposal. c. Useless - appropriate for proposals that display a high level of floccinaucinihilipilificatiousness. Proposals nominated for this category should have little or no true function. d. Rejuvinating - appropriate for proposals that add life and excitement to the game. Proposals nominated for this category should cultivate interesting concepts in the same way as a gardener who tends his field. e. Silly - appropriate for proposals that dispaly jejune behavior. Proposals nominated in this category typically will not be taken seriously. f. Befuddling - appropriate for proposals which could be submitted by a womble. Proposals nominated in this category will be excessively complex, far beyond what is required to convey the concept. 4. At the end of each week each eligible proposal that received more votes for a specific category than any other proposal shall be the winner of that category for that week. If two or more proposals are tied for the most nominations in a category, or if there were no nominations for a category then there shall be no winner of that category for that week. 5. At the end of each week, the Host shall attempt to award 5 points to each winning proposal and distribute them to the author of said proposal. Then the Host shall attempt to award each party who submitted a valid ballot during that week a 1 point participation bonus. 6. The Host shall keep a record of all winning proposals and their authors, and shall publish weekly a list of past winners and current eligible proposals.
