On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:24 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5667  O1  1.9  BobTHJ      Some players are more equal than others
> FOR*(lambda m:...

Since ehird insists that \x03 doesn't count...

I retract this vote and vote FOR*(lambda m:(lambda c:(lambda
f:f(f,0,0,[0]*1000))(lambda
f,n,p,a:(('',a,n)) if p>=len(c) else ((lambda dc:dc[c[p]]() if c[p] in
dc.keys() else 
f(f,n,p+1,a))({43:lambda:f(f,n,p+1,a[:n]+[(a[n]+1)%256]+a[n+1:]),45:lambda:f(f,n,p+1,a[:n]+[(a[n]-1)%256]+a[n+1:]),62:lambda:f(f,n+1,p+1,a),60:lambda:f(f,n-1,p+1,a),46:lambda:(lambda
v:(chr(a[n])+v[0],v[1],v[2]))(f(f,n,p+1,a)),91:lambda:(f(f,n,((lambda
g:g(g,p+1,1)) (lambda f,n,p:n if p==0 else f(f,n+1,p+1) if c[n]==91
else f(f,n+1,p-1) if c[n]==93 else f(f,n+1,p))),a)) if a[n]==0 else
((lambda v:(lambda w:(v[0]+w[0],w[1],w[2]))(f(f,v[2],p,v[1])))
(f(f,n,p+1,a))),93:lambda:('',a,n)})))[0])([ord(i) for i in
m]))('+++++++[->+++++++<]>++.')

Reply via email to