I know Warrigal doesn't want REMAND, but it seems like the appropriate
judgement here so that e can consider the arguments that have been made
since eir judgement. I suggest e recuses emself once it's remanded.
I intend, with the support of two of {BobTHJ, comex, the CotC}, to send
the following message on behalf of the judicial panel in CFJ 2274a:
{{{New arguments have come up since the judgement, which the judge
should be given a chance to consider and agree with or rebut. This panel
therefore REMANDs CFJ 2274a.}}}
--
ais523
