On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 15:24, Roger Hicks <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 15:57, Chris Blair <[email protected]> wrote: >> While comex might be correct in saying that the name of a player >> doesn't affect the rules, it does, however, affect the game of Agora >> itself. In order to refer to a player in singular, it is necessary for >> that player to have a unique name, otherwise ambiguities might arise >> that could confuse the issue. >> >> Seeing as how no other entity in Agora, as of three months before the >> player formerly known as ehird changed their name to the null string >> (""), bore the name of the null string; and as I do not particularly >> find the player formerly known as ehird's new name confusing, >> >> I rule TRUE on CFJ 2303. >> > I intend (with 2 support) to appeal this judgment. I do find the name > "" to be confusing.
I support this. Gratuitous arguments for the appeal: The judgment does not consider the existence of the very similar (identically?) named patent title. -woggle
