On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 14:18 -0800, Taral wrote:
> Scorekeepor's Scoreboard
>
> Time of last report: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:02
> Time of this report: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:11
>
> (All times are in UTC. Precision in timing not guaranteed.)
>
> *** Scores are indeterminate until potential scams are resolved. Below
> is the score report under the assumption that the scams failed to
> award any points. ***
>
> Player Score
> -----------------
> ais523 2+0i
> BobTHJ 10+0i
> comex 4+0i
> ehird 7+0i
> Elysion 1+0i
> Goethe 3+0i
> Murphy 100+0i
> OscarMeyr 7+0i
> Pavitra 5+0i
> root 2+0i
> Sgeo 1+0i
> Taral 3+0i
>
> All other players have a score of 0+0i.
>
> Score Index: 2
I submit the following proposal (AI=3, II=1, Title="Scam reset"):
{{{
If ais523 and comex won by points in the month of December, ratify the
Scorekeepor's Report that was quoted in the message that first published
this proposal, under the assumption that all the scores in it are
unconditionally correct. Otherwise, do nothing.
}}}
(Unfortunately, the more locked-down the rules get, the more damage
scams have to cause. I didn't really want to mess up everyone's scores
scamming a win, but there wasn't an obvious alternative; Murphy
suggested I could reset points by proposal, so here we are. Ratifying a
report will change scores, but not the events leading up to them; and as
this would be ratification of a false report, I'm doing it via proposal
not without-objection, so everyone's clear on the circumstances.)
--
ais523
