On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 00:37, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2282a
>
> ============================ Appeal 2282a ============================
>
> Panelist: ais523
> Decision:
>
> Panelist: Goethe
> Decision:
>
> Panelist: woggle
> Decision:
>
> ========================================================================
[snip]
I intend, with the support of ais523 and Goethe, to cause the panel in
CFJ 2282a to send the following message:
{{
The panel judges REMAND. Annotations are characterized by their
attempt to explain or comment on the object they annotate; truth, in
contrast, is not an essentially attribute. In light of this, the panel
asks that H. Prior Judge Murphy reconsider whether the purported
annotations were annotations and consider whether other requirements
(for example, R105-related requirements) were met.
}}
-woggle
