On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 6059 D 1 2.0 comex "Voluntary" creation of rests >> FOR > > I've found the scam here I believe; I'm not going to describe it > while this is being voted for in case comex hasn't thought of it :), > but I strongly recommend Against here. -Goethe
It's not a scam (ttPF!). Nor do I think ais523's pronoun argument is very convincing-- the referent is clear. I suppose it'll fail now-- good for me now that I realize the Vote Market might force me to create large amounts of Rests.
