On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:28, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2389 > > ============================== CFJ 2389 ============================== > > The message with message-ID [email protected] was > successful in assigning an appeals opinion to CFJ 2355a. > > ========================================================================
Context: == Message-ID: <[email protected]> From: Ed Murphy <[email protected]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Agora Business <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: BUS: Appeals 2355a and 2356a Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:41:14 -0800 I move to REMAND each of these. I'm not sure whether the judge intended to agree with the defendant's late arguments or merely acknowledge that they have some weight, but in any case I believe e will give them due consideration in a re-judgement. == I judge TRUE. "of these", in context, had no other reasonable referent and no extraordinary effort was required to identify its referrent, so body of the message was not ambiguous or unclear, and the body of the message did announce that Murphy was performing the action in question. [I do _not_, however, agree with the caller's arguments as the body of that message did not actually announce (let alone do so clearly) the initiation of a CFJ.] - woggle
