CFJ: A Notice of Violation accusing ehird of Failure to Apologize regarding CFJ 2347 is necessarily invalid due to Rule 2239.
I disqualify ehird. Caller's arguments: Goethe wrote: > On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: >> I judge CFJ 2393 TRUE. A rule imposing a deadline is violated when >> the deadline occurs; continued failure to perform the required action >> does not itself violate the rules, and indeed if the person required >> to perform the action does so after the deadline, they have still >> violated the rule by not performing the action on time. > > This CFJ misses one of the questions surrounding ehird's case; > that is, ehird deregistered before the time limit expired (thus was > under no obligation when the time limit actually expired) then re- > registered later, (perhaps?) placing emself under the obligation at > the moment of registration. -Goethe
