On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Note that it's possible for the Promotor to create and distribute a
> proposal in the same message; publishing a body of text with a clear
> indication that it's intended to be a proposal causes it to become a
> proposal, and attempting to distribute something is a clear intention
> that it's intended to be a proposal. Therefore, if the Promotor attempts
> to distribute a body of text not a proposal at the time, assigning a new
> ID number to it, it goes into and immediately out of the proposal pool,
> except that the Promotor is the author of the resulting proposal.
I intend to appeal this with 2 support, recommending REMAND. CFJ 1780
contradicts this paragraph; ais523 has indicated privately to me that
e disagrees with that judgement, but e should at least mention it in
eir own judgement if e's going to go against it. Also, Rule 106
reads:
A player CAN create a proposal by publishing ("submitting") a
body of text with a clear indication that it is intended to
become a proposal, which places the proposal in the Proposal
Pool.
ais523 misquoted the rule. While an incorrectly distributed proposal
clearly is intended to *be* a proposal, there is certainly no
indication that it is to *become* a proposal (implying that it
previously wasn't one).
