On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > coppro's caste flips on or about Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:08:13 -0600 > were illegal.
I judge TRUE. I accept caller's argument that the holder of the Grand Poobah office is only obligated, and thus only allowed, to correct changes e made emself. Thus, even if Goethe succeeded in multiple caste flips (which I don't believe e did, but that's a matter for the appeal in the revelant CFJ), coppro would not be responsible for fixing them through other caste flips.
