On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 08:33 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > =================== CFJ 2482 (Interest Index = 2) ==================== > > The right of participation in the fora (Rule 101) takes > precedence over the prohibition against excessive Notices of > Violation (Rule 2230). > > ========================================================================
I judge this TRUE; rule 101 has higher Power, so by rule 1482 it does indeed take precedence. At this point, I'd normally answer the question that this case probably meant to ask, which is whether there is a conflict between the two rules such that the precedence relationship actually matters. However, I have a rather obvious conflict of interest concerning this matter, so I won't opine on it in this judgement, and instead I'll CFJ on it. I call for judgement, with II 2, on the statement "The prohibition on excessive Notices of Violation in rule 2230 is ineffective due to rule 101", barring Murphy. -- ais523 Judge, CFJ 2482
