On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > ============================== CFJ 2486 ============================== > > A Rule and its text can have different power.
I judge FALSE. From R2141, the content of a rule takes the form of a text. That text is in essence the rule, and when considered as a separate entity it's not that rule's text. As Murphy points out, the text may be duplicated in a different context, and this duplicate text, as an entity with 0 power (assuming it's duplicated in a non-instrument), may be character-for-character equal as a string to the text of the rule, while missing the rule-nature that would allow us to call it "the same text".
