On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > [This is what happens when you forget to disqualify.] > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2490 > > ============================== CFJ 2490 ============================== > > root has a rest. > > ========================================================================
TRUE: "I create a rest" is suitably unambiguous because root could only possibly have meant to create it in eir own possession: no other methods of creating rests by announcement are defined in the rules. However, "I spend C C to destroy a rest" would be ambiguous even if the intended target is fairly obvious.
