TTttPF
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Sgeo<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Geoffrey Spear<[email protected]> wrote: >> Disclaimer: The text of proposals below may or may not be correct. >> I've had to guess what each person submitting a proposal intended to >> type into their email client when submitting a message. It's entirely >> possible this entire distribution is ineffective. >> >> >> This distribution of proposals 6344-6354 initiates the Agoran >> Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible voters for ordinary >> proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic >> proposals are the active first-class players, and the vote collector >> is the Assessor. The valid options on each decision are FOR, AGAINST, >> and PRESENT. >> >> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE >> 6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off > AGAINST - That definition of Mentally Assaulting an Officer is useless >> 6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel > FOR, unless there's reason to believe that this can hurt Agora. >> 6346 O 2 1.0 coppro Ribbon oops >> 6347 O 0 1.0 coppro Ribbon cleanup > FOR >> 6348 O 1 1.0 coppro B Friends > FOR, although tbh I preferred the old B. >> 6349 D 1 2.0 Pavitra Newbie Friendly > FOR >> 6350 O 1 1.7 coppro <none> > AGAINST - What if there's eventually a real conflict with rules that > for some reason, mention woodchucks? >> 6351 D 2 2.0 C-walker <none> > FOR >> 6352 O 0 1.0 Murphy Begin at the beginning > FOR >> 6353 D 1 2.0 Murphy s/object/either > FOR >> 6354 D 1 2.0 ais523 Sensible Rest destruction > AGAINST -- It's probably my imagination, but I think that could be > interpreted to mean that once those conditions come about, anyone can > destroy any rests.. >
