On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Sean Hunt<[email protected]> wrote: > Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Aaron Goldfein<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Proposal: No More Distributability (AI = 2, II = 2) >>> >>> Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) to read: >>> >>> The Promotor is an office; its holder is responsible for >>> receiving and distributing proposals. >>> >>> The Promotor CAN and MAY distribute a proposal in the Proposal >>> Pool at any time. The Promotor's weekly duties include the >>> distribution of each proposal that has been in the Proposal Pool >>> since the beginning of that week. >>> >>> For an Agoran decision of whether to adopt a proposal, the >>> following are essential parameters: >>> >>> a) Its author (and co-authors, if any). >>> b) Its interest index. >>> >>> Distributed proposals have ID numbers, to be assigned by the >>> Promotor. >>> >>> The Promotor's report includes a list of all proposals in the >>> Proposal Pool. >>> >>> [This is the exact same version as before the recent Distributability >>> amendment.] >>> >>> End Proposal >>> >>> I intend, with three support, to make the above proposal Distributable. >> >> I act on behalf of coppro to support this. I act on behalf of Pavitra >> to support this. I act on behalf of zeckalpha to support this. Having >> received sufficient support, I make this proposal distributable. > Fails, you can't act on behalf of zeckalpha (try allispaul instead).
Oops. I've confused the new players. I act on behalf of allispaul to support this. Having received sufficient support, I make this proposal distributable.
