Ed Murphy wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2557a > > ============================ Appeal 2557a ============================ > > Panelist: Tiger > Decision: > > Panelist: coppro > Decision: > > Panelist: Quazie > Decision: > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Appeal initiated: 06 Jun 2009 17:42:42 GMT > Assigned to Tiger (panelist): (as of this message) > Assigned to coppro (panelist): (as of this message) > Assigned to Quazie (panelist): (as of this message) > > ======================================================================== > > Appellant coppro's Arguments: > > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgment as homonyms (and hence > the bad puns used here) are not a valid means of interpreting a statement.
I opine REASSIGN, as ehird has shown alack interest in taking this case seriously, and does not have a record of providing carefully-considered judgments.
