Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/6/11 Ed Murphy <[email protected]>:
>> ============================== CFJ 2577 ==============================
>>
>> Sgeo has cast an unconditional vote on the Decision to adopt
>> Proposal 6345
>>
>> ========================================================================
>>
>> Sgeo wrote:
>> > I change this vote to FOR.
>>
>> ========================================================================
>
> The changing of the vote failed, as one has to
> retract and recast, so the original conditional vote is all e's cast.
> I judge 2577 FALSE.
I intend to appeal this judgement with 2 support. "Change this vote to
X" should be an unambiguous synonym for "retract this vote and vote X".
In particular, I would like the judge to set the precedent that, when a
person attempts Y, and Y is superficially impossible but it's obvious
that e should have done Z to achieve the intended effect ("That doesn't
work. You want to do Z."), and there is only one Z that could achieve
the intent of Y, and said intent is clear and unambiguous, then Y is a
synonym for Z.
