Ed Murphy wrote: > =================== CFJ 2619 (Interest Index = 0) ==================== > > Wooble is party to at least one private contract containing the > word "inferences". > > ========================================================================
The history and circumstances of this case strongly suggest that the following will be completely futile, but I will make a token attempt anyway, as a ritual gesture. I hereby request any and all persons to submit evidence and arguments, either publicly or by private email to me, that may be relevant to this case. In particular, I would be interested in hearing from H. Caller c., H. Notary ais523, and H. Wooble. Judge Pavitra
