On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Sean Hunt<ride...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I recommend that the judgment be {Each party to the IBA SHALL vote FOR
> both Motions to Amend the IBA}, and that it be delivered posthaste, so
> that the quorum issue doesn't prevent our contract from being fixed.
I judge CFJ 2636 as follows:
{Any party of the IBA may act on behalf of another member to vote FOR
any Motion to Amend started before August 8th. No party shall vote
AGAINST these Motions.}
--
Taral <tar...@gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
