On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: > G. wrote: >> I recuse myself from 2651. comex, coppro seems to be on your side. >> Why don't you two judge it and let us know how it turns out. I'm >> sorry I bothered, I was actually pretty close to coming around to >> your side; I was checking a couple things but you had generally >> convinced me. > > I feel obliged to remind you both that the caller does not control > whether assignments are linked.
Oh my lord, it's probably been a couple years since I noticed the linked CFJ rule. Well I guess you can link mine to it, sorry I didn't stick with it a little longer but now the whole set can stay together. I transfer a prop from comex (for spamming) to Murphy (for further dealing with it; it's a two-prop offence). -G.
