Roger Hicks wrote: > coppro deputized for the Anarchist to deal emself cards from the deck > of change. This violated the SHALL NOT in R2259. I'm really not sure > if this should be called against coppro or allispaul. > > NOV: > I publish an NOV against coppro for violating power=2 rule R2259 by > deputizing for the Anarchist to deal emself cards before hand limits > had been enforced for the month. > > BobTHJ
I contest this NoV. I initiate a criminal case, II 2, from that NoV. Note: I will be away for a few days. It shouldn't be long enough to affect my play. -coppro
