Pavitra wrote: > I submit the following proposal, "Trivial Judgements", II=1, AI=2: I retract that and submit the following proposal:
"Trivial Judgements 1.1", II=1, AI=2:
{{
If any single amendment in this proposal would fail other than due to
this sentence, then this proposal as a whole except for this sentence
has no effect.
Amend Rule 2225 (Interest Index of Judicial Cases) to read as follows:
{
Each judicial case has an interest index, which CAN be set by
its initiator at the time of initiation, or otherwise defaults to
zero.
A player CAN, Without N Objections, increase or decrease the
interest index of a judicial case by 1, where N is the 4 minus the
interest index of that case immediately prior to that change.
A player CAN set the interest index of a disinterested judicial
case to 1 by announcement.
When a player recuses emself from a judicial case whose interest
index equals eir rank, the case's interest index is increased by 1
unless the recusing player announces in the same message that it
should not.
}
Amend Rule 1871 (The Standing Court) by inserting, immediately after the
paragraph reading:
{
When the CotC assigns a player as judge, that player becomes
sitting.
}
the paragraph:
{
A sitting player that assigns judgement in a disinterested
judicial case CAN and MAY become standing by announcement in the
same message in which e assigns judgement to that case.
}
Amend Rule 2262 (The Deck of Justice) by replacing "judges a case" with
"judges an interested case".
Amend Rule 2199 (Ribbons) by replacing "assigns a judgement to a
judicial question" with "assigns a judgement to a judicial question in
an interested judicial case" in both places.
}}
[
Boring, obvious CFJs ("Trivially TRUE"/"Trivially FALSE"/"Trivially
UNDETERMINED"/etc.) basically "don't count" -- you don't get
being-a-judge rewards for them, and they don't take up a turn in the
rotation.
Also, setting II is a little more democratic (no longer CotC/Justiciar
prerogative) and has a slight bias towards higher IIs (since controversy
generally indicates interestingness, it's easier to increase than
decrease a case's II.)
Version 1.1 removes the potential for II "edit wars" by changing With N
Support to Without 4-N Objections.
TLDR: Trivial CFJ is trivial.
]
Pavitra
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
