I initiate a CFJ on the following statement, setting its II to 2:
* The proposals FRC Recognition and No Vacancy v.2 are both Distributable.
Arguments:
The relevant text from R2259 (Hand Limits), which is quoted fully in
the evidence below, states that:
When any other entity is audited X random cards that entity
owns are destroyed, where X equals the number of card that
entity owns minus eir hand limit (minimum 0)..
This means that when I self-audited, 10 Cards in my possession were
destroyed, but there is no way to find out exactly which ones were
destroyed. Therefore I argue for a judgement of UNDETERMINED.
Also, I am disregarding Tiger's messages as they have no authority on
the matter (except if they count as a self-ratifying report, in which
case this CFJ probably counts as a doubt on the document).
Evidence:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Charles
Walker<[email protected]> wrote:
> I spend Distrib-u-matic to make the proposal FIXME Distributable.
>
> I go on hold.
>
> I audit myself.
>
> I come off hold.
>
> I spend Distrib-u-matic to make the proposal FRC Recognition Distributable.
>
> I spend Distrib-u-matic to make the proposal No Vacancy v.2 Distributable.
>From Rule 2259 (Hand Limits):
Any entity CAN audit itself by announcement. When an active
player is audited that player gains one Rest for each
rule-defined card e owns in excess of eir hand limit (minimum
0). When any other entity is audited X random cards that entity
owns are destroyed, where X equals the number of card that
entity owns minus eir hand limit (minimum 0)..
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
