I call for judgement on the statement "Rule 101 is greater than rule 2029".
Evidence: Excerpt from Rule 2141: "Rules have ID numbers, to be assigned by the Rulekeepor, and are strictly ordered." Arguments: The power-3 rule 2141, by insisting that rules are strictly ordered, implies that it's possible to have a meaningful less-than/greater-than comparison between them. However, nothing in the ruleset seems to imply what the ordering actually /is/: precedence? power? ID number? order of enactment? something else? It's rather lucky that the relevant bit of gamestate is currently completely irrelevant, or we'd have major headaches trying to figure out just what that platonic order is. -- ais523
