On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I retract the above CFJ and submit a a new one:
>
> {{A decision to adopt the proposal "voter defaults" exists.}}
>
> (The initial distribution was flawed beyond the Chamber issue, since
> it failed to indicate that each proposal was Ordinary.)
>
> Arguments: the attempted re-distribution applies the everyday language
> use of the undefined term 'Chamber' from the ruleset, namely, the
> deliberative body considering the proposal.
I favor this one, too. -G.
