On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I intend, with two support, to appeal this case's question on sentencing. The
> DISCHARGE clause seems to apply when players
> exceed the number of ergs they have because they do not know how many they
> have, which is reasonable given that the PSM's
> report is only published once per week at the most. The clause is probably
> not supposed to apply to other ignorance of the
> rules, an which committed in different ways would result in punishments.
I support. The appropriate question to ask is not whether the
defendant in question misinterpreted, but whether it was a
reasonable misinterpretation to make (I personally don't think it
is, but either way, the judge didn't address it).
