On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:51 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > Wooble wrote: > > > If and only if Agora was Satisfied with my intent to register with > > Agoran Consent, I do so. > > > > (I count 3 supporters and 3 objectors, but Murphy's count was 4 and 1. > > I think eir count is almost certainly wrong because ais523 and ehird > > both unambiguously objected (granted, ais523 *also* unambiguously > > supported, but I see nothing in the rules to make either negate the > > other), but that doesn't mean mine is correct.) > > Obligatory CFJ, disqualifying Wooble: Agora is Satisfied with > Wooble's recent intent to register with Agoran Consent. > > Evidence: To the best of my knowledge, here are all announcements > that might have counted as support and/or objection to the intent:
[snip] Arguments: Note that I interpreted many of the messages as supporting/objecting to/favouring/etc. other player's supports/objections, rather than Wooble's original intent. (It's something of an Agoran tradition to have random supports/objections/etc. in a-d in response to blank or test messages, in fact, the interpretation of Roujo's "I support and do so" as anything but a gameplay-irrelevant joke on the general theme didn't occur to me until this spate of CFJs.) -- ais523
